Abstract：After the birth of community correction, the management mode did not become a problem for quite a long period of history until the anti-correction movement seriously questioned the rehabilitation movement led by social workers. In the evidence-based correction movement, the management mode became a controversial issue, and numerous research evidences showed that the correction effect of integrated management mode was better than that of supervision mode and rehabilitation mode. Based on questionnaire survey and interviews, this article holds that the Beijing mode of community correction basically belongs to the supervision type, the Shenzhen mode is a hybrid type, and the Shanghai mode is also hybrid but with a bias to rehabilitation. The analysis and test of survey data shows that the Shenzhen mode and Shanghai modes are superior to the Beijing mode, and the increase of the proportion of social workers among frontline staff would reduce the recidivism to some extent. It is suggested that more social worker proportions are required in the community correction management system to enhance the hybrid management. The call for comprehensive staff and community correction police should be carefully considered.
熊贵彬. 社区矫正三大管理模式及社会工作介入效果分析——基于循证矫正视角[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2020, 34(2): 114-125.
XIONG Guibin. Three Management Modes of Community Correction and the Effect of Social Work Intervention: from an Evidence-based Correction View. Journal of Zhejing Gongshang University, 2020, 34(2): 114-125.
2020, Vol. 34 
浙公网安备 33011802000512号