Abstract：The difference between symbolic fact and objective fact lasts for a long time within grass-roots social governance. On the one hand, central government pays more attention on residents self-governance and deliberate democracy; on the other hand, local governments takes public management and professional social service as its concerns. In addition, the multiplicity and popularity of its tasks results in the residents committee distract from the regular public management to develop informal flavor relationship and construct positive members by which to govern the community. Behind The double paradoxes is a more complex problem that the authority type and governance system of our country are still Charismatic authority and administrated contracting-out system. The solution to the double paradoxes is to change the Charismatic authority and contracting-out system.
郭伟和. 基层社会治理的双重背离现象及对其探源[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2018, 32(1): 97-106.
GUO Weihe. Double Paradoxes of the Grass-roots Social Governance and its Origins . Journal of Zhejing Gongshang University, 2018, 32(1): 97-106.
2018, Vol. 32 
浙公网安备 33011802000512号