As is generally known, logos results from the further development of myth. As the matter of fact, to some extent, logos is a kind of myth. In various cultural activities a type of work on myth relates to the topic of this article, namely that the rational cannot reach to the core of its writing, and that meanwhile people would not like to have the irrational take the place of the rational. As a result, a sort of character, produced in the core of the myth, is both divine and evil, both positive and negative, and is oriented in the middle of the aesthetic creation. This aesthetic myth is a fundamental connotation of poetics, which is differentiated from the “pure aesthetic” notion held by the public. By the function of “the specification of integration”(Spezifikation des Ganzen), aesthetic myth has achieved a balanced state of the separation of powers, in which various heterogeneous elements are contained, and by the way of “gods playing” it gives the human the good artistic life as a present.