Abstract：This article analyzes the measures UK financial regulators applied as responses to the 2008 financial crisis, in order to provide reference for the post-crisis regulation for our country. The article compares the pros and cons of rule-based regulations and principal-based regulations, then takes United Kingdom as an example, analyzing the introspection and rectification of the principal-based regulations, and the prudent incremental changes of the legal rules, proposed that the regulators in our country should focus more on the reconsideration upon the principles of the regulation, rather than the change of the legal rules themselves, which may be a more meaningful and cost effective choice in practice. The revised principal-based regulations may provide reference for our country to answer the questions caused by the complexity and innovations of the financial market. Finally, the article points out the non-transparency in the process of government bailout leads to the unpredictability of the market, and proposes that our government should draw lessons from their experience, to make the rescue process more open and definite, to ensure the predictability of law. Therefore the market participants will be able to expect the consequences of their actions.
张晓晨. 我国金融监管的立法选择:：以英国危机应对为鉴[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2015, (4): 55-64.
ZHANG Xiaochen. The Choice of legislation of China's Financial Regulation:An Example of UK's Experience in Addressing the Crises. Journal of Zhejing Gongshang University, 2015, (4): 55-64.
2015, Vol. 
浙公网安备 33011802000512号