创业团队组成特征与研发强度：基于创业板上市公司的研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献(0)
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (1413 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

本研究以中国创业板首批上市公司的792个创业团队为样本，从财务和人本角度研究了创业团队组成特征对企业研发强度的影响。结果发现：创业团队教育水平与四类研发强度均显著正相关，职称水平与员工人均研发费用显著正相关，平均年龄与研发费用占总资产比例显著负相关，职称水平异质性与研发费用占总资产比例、员工人均研发费用显著负相关；创业团队组成特征和人本角度研发强度的相关显著水平高于财务角度研发强度；董事长个人职称与员工人均研发费用显著正相关，创业团队特征能解释更多的研发强度变异，支持了高层梯队理论。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	姚振华

关键词 ：创业团队, 组成特征, 研发强度

Abstract：

Based on 792 Entrepreneurial Teams (ET) of public enterprises of Growth Enterprises Market, This study explored the effects of EI composition traits on Research & Development（R&D） intensity from both people-oriented and finance-oriented perspectives. The study found: ET average education, average professional rank, average age and professional rank heterogeneity had significant effect on R&D intensity; the correlation coefficients of ET traits and people-oriented R&D intensity were bigger and more significant than with finance-oriented R&D intensity; the board chairman professional rank was significantly related with R&D intensity, and the EI composition traits explained more R&D intensity variance, supporting Upper Echelon Theory.

Key words： entrepreneurial team composition R&D intensity

收稿日期: 2013-11-19 出版日期: 2014-01-15

基金资助:

广东省自然科学基金

通讯作者: 姚振华 E-mail: yaozhenhua@aliyun.com

引用本文:

姚振华. 创业团队组成特征与研发强度：基于创业板上市公司的研究[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2014, (1): 101-109. YAO Zhenhua. Entrepreneurial Team Composition Traits and R&D Intensity: A Study on Public Enterprises of Growth Enterprises Market. Journal of Zhejing Gongshang University, 2014, (1): 101-109.

链接本文:

http://zzs.zjgsu.edu.cn/xb/CN/ 或 http://zzs.zjgsu.edu.cn/xb/CN/Y2014/V/I1/101

[1]	Hambrick D. C. & Mason P. A. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2): 193-206.
[2]	Hambrick D. C. Upper echelons theory: an update [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32（2）: 334-343.
[3]	洪明.论企业高管团队的利器——团队领导力——以复星集团的五人团队为例[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2005, 161(3): 31-38.
[4]	刘运国. R&D支出研究文献回顾与展望[J].上海立信会计学院学报, 2010, 24(4): 23-30.
[5]	李丹蒙, 夏立军. 股权性质、制度环境与上市公司R&D强度[J]. 财经研究, 2008, 34(4):93-104.
[6]	Barker V. L, Mueller GC. CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending [J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(6): 782-801.
[7]	刘运国, 刘雯. 我国上市公司的高管任期与R&D支出[J].管理世界, 2007, (1): 128-136.
[8]	Hoffman R. C, Hegarty W. H. Top management influence on innovations: effects of executive characteristics and social culture [J]. Journal of Management, 1993, 19(3): 549-574.
[9]	Bantel K. A, jackson S. E. Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference [J]? Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10(1): 107-124.
[10]	Carmen C. O, Ana Beatriz H. L, Ram V. C. The relationship between top management teams and innovative capacity in companies [J]. The Journal of Management Development, 2005, 24(8): 683-705.
[11]	Daellenbach U. S, McCarthy A. M, Schoenecker TS. Commitment to innovation: the impact of top management team characteristics [J]. R&D Management, 1999, 29(3): 199-209.
[12]	孙海法, 姚振华, 严茂盛. 高管团队人口统计特征对纺织和信息技术公司经营绩效的影响[J]. 南开管理评论, 2006, 9(6): 61－67.
[13]	Michel J. G, Hambrick D. C. Diversification posture and top management team characteristics [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1992, 35(1): 9-37.
[14]	王任飞. 企业R&D支出的内部影响因素研究——基于中国电子信息百强企业之实证[J]. 科学学研究, 2005, 23(2): 225-231.
[15]	Elenkov D. S, Judge W, Wright P. Strategic leadership and executive innovation influence: an international multi-cluster comparative study [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(7): 665-682.
[16]	Lyon D. W, Ferrier W. J. Enhancing performance with product-market innovation: the influence of the top management team [J]. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2002, 14(4): 452-469.