|
|
Labor Standard Law for the Regulation of “Overtime Hours Arrangement”: International Reference and China's Approach |
CAO Yan |
School of Economic Law, Northwest University of Political Science and Law
|
|
|
Guide |
|
Abstract: In the era of flexible working hours, western countries generally adopt the transformed working hours system to realize the flexible regulation of labor benchmark of overtime hours, and mitigate the negative effects caused by the lack of mandatory benchmark of overtime hours by expanding workers' autonomy in working hours. In order to solve the problem of rigid legal regulations on the labor standard of overtime hours arrangement in China, the Labor Law should break the boundary between the comprehensively calculated working hour system and the standard working hour system, organically combine the two, expand the flexibility of the mandatory standard working hour benchmark application, and achieve the flexibility of overtime hours regulations. In order to reduce overtime hours, the current total annual working hours shall be used as the upper limit, and a flexible regulation of overtime hours with a reference period of 3 months shall be adopted, clearly stipulating the maximum number of working hours per day and per week during the reference period. At the same time, the compensatory rest system for work overtime and the determination process for work overtime arrangement shall also be improved to ensure the autonomy of workers' time, thus achieving the regulatory goal of balancing “flexibility” and “safety” in “overtime hours arrangement”.
|
Received: 22 February 2023
Published: 15 August 2023
|
|
Fund: |
|
|
|
[1] |
罗峰.泛消费、去技能与再组织:互联网时代的基础性零工经济何以可能[J].浙江工商大学学报,2021(6):119-127.
|
[2] |
文军,刘雨婷.新就业形态的不确定性:平台资本空间中的数字劳动及其反思[J].浙江工商大学学报,2021(6):92-106.
|
[3] |
侯慧,何雪松.“不加班不成活”:互联网知识劳工的劳动体制[J].探索与争鸣,2020(5):115-123.
|
[4] |
梁萌.弹性工时制何以失效?——互联网企业工作压力机制的理论与实践研究[J].社会学评论,2019(3):35-49.
|
[5] |
郑尚元.《劳动法典》法典编纂的能与不能[J].法治研究,2023(3):18-32.
|
[6] |
谢增毅.劳动法典编纂的重大意义与体例结构[J].中国法学,2023(3):5-24.
|
[7] |
谢增毅.劳动法典的体例结构:国际经验及其启示[J].北方法学,2022(6):22-29.
|
[8] |
林嘉,陈文涛.论劳动基准法的法律效力[J].清华法学,2014(4):6-17.
|
[9] |
赵红梅.论我国工时制度的缺陷、价值功能及其完善[J].环球法律评论,2020(1):41-57.
|
[10] |
王倩.论我国特殊工时制的改造:在弹性与保障之间[J].法学评论,2021(6):93-105.
|
[11] |
陈靖远.自主性劳动者标准工时适用除外及其限制[J].法学,2021(11):144-159.
|
[12] |
杨河清,王欣.新常态下我国过度劳动法律规制问题研究[J].南京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(5):71-77.
|
[13] |
耿紫珍,肖萌萌,王海珍等.利弊几何?加班工作的研究述评与展望[J].中国人力资源开发,2021(12):6-21.
|
[14] |
张学志.蒋帆.陈展培.标准工时制对工作时长与工资回报的影响研究——基于《劳动法》实施效果的实证检验[J].学术研究,2020(11):89-95.
|
[15] |
向玉乔,沈莹.时间的共享伦理意蕴[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020(1):17-24.
|
[16] |
钱叶芳,徐顺铁.“996类工作制”与休息权立法——资本与法律的博弈[J].浙江学刊,2019(4):56-67.
|
[17] |
台湾地区劳动法学会.劳动基准法释义[G].台北:新学林出版公司,2005:332.
|
[18] |
沃尔夫冈?多伊普勒.德国劳动法 [M].王倩,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2018:187-190.
|
[19] |
徐婉宁.论日本工作方式改革关联法中劳基法之规制方式变革[J].台大法学论,2021(4):1819.
|
[20] |
荒木尚志.勞動法[M].日文原文.東京:有斐閣,2009:145.
|
|
|
|